Controversial” WHO pandemic treaty raises concerns about fundamental freedoms

The World Health Organisation (WHO) is once again in the spotlight as it has convened a marathon meeting in Geneva to push through key parts of the pandemic treaty by May 2024. This treaty, which aims to regulate how the WHO and the international community will deal with future pandemics, has sparked controversy and attracted critics who fear it could restrict fundamental freedoms.

Critics argue that the proposed treaty gives too much power to a few and poses a potential threat to fundamental freedoms. Concerns raised include the WHO’s desire for more control over national decisions on health issues and more powers to combat misinformation. The treaty could also make it easier for the WHO to declare a pandemic, which could lead to measures such as lockdowns, mandatory masks and mandatory vaccines being imposed without sufficient oversight.

Legal scholar and Sky News contributor Rocco Loano joined the discussion and pointed out the alarming implications of the treaty. He expressed concern about the WHO’s desire to repeat past mistakes and referred to the organisation’s confidence in China’s actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Loano warned that the adoption of such measures could lead to draconian restrictions like those in Australia, without taking into account alternative strategies from countries such as Sweden and certain states in the United States.

The conversation also touched on the issue of accountability. Loano criticised the lack of a robust investigation into the government’s response to the pandemic. He pointed to the inadequacy of toothless investigations that lack the power to compel witnesses and may fail to answer critical questions about government decision-making and its impact on public health and individual rights.

Mr Loano also highlighted the state of Australia’s education system, referring to a Grattan Institute report showing how poor the literacy skills of school children are. Despite record levels of funding, educational outcomes continue to decline, raising questions about the effectiveness of current approaches to addressing systemic problems in the education sector.

In conclusion, the discussion emphasised the need for vigilance in protecting fundamental freedoms amidst efforts to combat future pandemics. As the WHO pushes forward with its agenda, concerns remain about the potential erosion of rights and freedoms. This emphasises the importance of robust oversight and accountability mechanisms to ensure that any measures implemented prioritise public health while respecting individual freedoms.

Source